FTC turns back challenge on patent coverage

نویسنده

  • Richard H. Stern
چکیده

The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has overturned a decision by one of its administrative law judges, which held that the agency lacked power to stop patent owners from deceptively inducing state regulatory agencies to adopt standards subject to patent protection. The charge in controversy was that the Union Oil Company of California (Unocal) violated antitrust laws by deceiving the California Air Resources Board (CARB). This alleged misconduct occurred in regulatory proceedings for setting a gasoline content standard to lessen air pollution. The FTC’s administrative law judge had ruled the FTC had no regulatory power over conduct occurring in such government proceedings, and dismissed the charges without a factual trial of the allegations. This led to an appeal to the five-commissioner FTC, which unanimously reversed the initial decision. The effect of the reversal is to reinstate the proceeding against Unocal for a determination as to whether it had committed the alleged fraud on CARB concerning patents.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Effect of Gradation and Particle Shape on Sand Properties as Coverage of Beach Soccer Ground - Details of a Patent

Background. Beach soccer is one of the most well-known international sports in the world. The laws of the game were introduced by some associations and today they are covered by FIFA. There are also certain rules for the selection of beach soccer sand, but the specifications are too simple and rough. Thus, a wide range of sand types falls in the acceptable range of FIFA. Objectives. In this st...

متن کامل

A Match Made for Court: Patent Assertion Entities and the Federal Trade Commission

Patent assertion entities (PAE), sometimes colloquially referred to as “patent trolls,” have recently found themselves to be quite the targets for policy-makers. From state attorneys general to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to legislators on both sides of the aisle, patent reforms aimed at deterring abusive PAE activity have been a topic heavily discussed and, in some cases, even enacted. ...

متن کامل

Why the Supreme Court Was Correct to Deny Certiorari in Ftc

In November 2008, the Federal Trade Commission petitioned the Supreme Court to review the D.C. Circuit’s decision in FTC v. Rambus. That decision reversed the Commission’s finding that Rambus knowingly failed to disclose a patent to a standard setting organization and, in so doing, acquired monopoly power in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act. In February 2009, the Supreme Court denied t...

متن کامل

Inter-Agency Conflict And Cooperation In Patent Litigation

Traditionally, Congress and commentators view administrative law as having little to do with patent litigation. There has been a recent increase, however, in various types of patent litigation that involve regulatory determinations, such as Hatch-Waxman Act patent litigation, section 337 proceedings in the ITC, standard essential organization (SEO) licensing lawsuits, and “biosimilar” cases. An...

متن کامل

3. Pharmaceutical Equivalence and Clinical Interchangeability between Lamivudine and Emtricitabine

The WHO 2013 consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection consider lamivudine (3TC) and emtricitabine (FTC) as clinically equivalent, recommending either drug to be used as part of first-line once-daily triple drug therapy. However, early in vitro studies have suggested that there may be pharmaceutical differences between the two drugs, su...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • IEEE Micro

دوره 24  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2004